Legal Opinion
Twohig v. Blackmer
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided May 20, 1996No. 22704PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Justice.
1. Attorney Ray Twohig petitioned this Court for a writ of superintending control vacating a trial court order prohibiting all trial participants from communicating with the media about the third trial of Twohig’s client, Gordon House. As grounds for his petition, Twohig claimed that this “gag order” impermissibly restricted his rights of free speech in violation of Article II, Section 17 of the New Mexico Constitution and our recently amended rule governing trial publicity, SCRA 1986, 16-306 (Repl.Pamp.1995). We assumed jurisdiction over Twohig’s petition under the New…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- House v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HouseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Albuquerque Journal v. JewellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001
- House v. HatchCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.