Legal Opinion
Openshaw v. FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided August 16, 2010No. Case SACV 10-00689-CJC(SSx)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
CORMAC J. CARNEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx”) moves to compel Plaintiff John Robert Openshaw to arbitrate his claims for wrongfully terminating his written agreement with FedEx to serve as a small package pick-up and delivery driver. FedEx’s agreement with Mr. Openshaw contains several arbitration provisions that are incredibly favorable to FedEx. It has a provision drastically reducing the time by which Mr. Openshaw must file a claim for wrongful termination against FedEx or forever…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Connie A. Nagrampa v. Mailcoups, Inc. The American Arbitration AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chun Ping Turng v. Guaranteed Rate, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Jean v. Bucknell UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Pappas v. AMN Healthcare ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Sui v. Fedex Ground Package System Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020