Legal Opinion
Hansen v. Rainbow Mining & Milling Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1932No. 5894PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GIVENS, J. —
By written contract, respondent agreed to perform for appellant Rainbow Mining & Milling Company, a specified amount of development work at so much per linear foot, and while so employed, suffered an injury for which he claims compensation.
Appellants contend that by reason specifically of this paragraph in the contract: “It is further agreed, that second party shall take care of and pay all charges relating to insurance or hospital charges in connection with the said work and will fully comply with the Idaho State Insurance Law in that respect and second party does hereby release…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Southern Pacific Company v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Claim of Doey v. Clarence P. Howland Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SterlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Wallace Bank & Trust Co. v. First National Bank of FairfieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Larson v. Independent School District No. 11JIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Hiebert v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Black Ex Rel. Black v. IsaakIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Blackburn v. OlsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.