Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Hudson
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 9, 1986No. Civ. A. 86-2236-SPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAFFELS, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on defendants Cale and Larry Hudson’s motion to dismiss, pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on the grounds that the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction and the action fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The defendant Cale Hudson has also filed a motion to answer out of time.
Defendants claim that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s [FDIC] motion should be dismissed as there is no federal subject matter jurisdiction. Defendants claim that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. W. Jerome AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. William W. Godshall and Martha D. GodshallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. AbrahamDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1977
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. RectenwallDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1951
- Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corp. v. FieldingDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main HurdmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. ScalettyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1992
- Glenborough New Mexico Associates v. Resolution Trust Corp.District Court, D. New Mexico · 1992
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HaddadDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.