Legal Opinion

State v. Mebane

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 25, 2004No. 89,640PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Tyrone Mebane appeals the denial of a motion to correct illegal sentence in which Mebane argued the sentencing judge erred when the judge did not address Mebane personally as required by K.S.A. 22-3424(e) to inquire if Mebane wished to present any evidence in mitigation of punishment. Mebane also appeals the district court’s denial of a motion for a nunc pro tunc order clarifying Mebane’s controlling minimum sentence. Finally, Me-bane argues that the district court erred in summarily denying the motions without appointing counsel and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Lamb v. Kansas Parole BoardCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
  4. State v. HuntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. State v. VanweySupreme Court of Kansas · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. SalarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  2. State v. LogsdonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  3. Juan Larin-Ulloa v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  4. State v. DenneySupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API