Legal Opinion

Holt Co. of Ohio v. Ohio MacHinery Co., 06ap-911 (10-18-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 18, 2007No. 06AP-911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, Holt Company of Ohio, HC Industries, LLC, and Holt Texas Properties, Inc. (collectively "Holt" or "plaintiffs") appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas that granted partial summary judgment in favor of defendants-appellees, Ohio Machinery Co. and OMCO Building, LLC (collectively "Ohio Machinery" or "defendants"). Because the trial court did not err by granting partial summary judgment in favor of Ohio Machinery, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

{¶ 2} Holt formerly owned and operated dealerships in Ohio, Indiana, and Kentucky…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Vahila v. HallOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Nolan v. NolanOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1997

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. RyanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Torrance v. RomOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Lopardo v. Lehman Bros., Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
  4. Executone of Columbus, Inc. v. Inter-Tel, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
  5. Callander v. Callander, 07ap-746 (5-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API