Legal Opinion

Talmadge Tinsley Co., Inc. v. Kerr

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 12, 1976No. 19030PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

GUITTARD, Justice.

After a nonjury trial, the judge signed a draft of judgment on March 3, 1976, and then signed another on April 17, 1976. We heretofore dismissed the appeal on the ground that no appeal was perfected from the first judgment and that the second judgment was void because, under Tex.R.Civ.P. 329b(5), the first judgment became final and not subject to modification thirty days after it was signed. Appellants now move for a rehearing contending that the first judgment was interlocutory only, and, alternatively, that the second judgment was a nunc pro tunc…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. HackworthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Lung v. VargaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  3. Calhoun v. BurdenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Woon Hur v. City of Mesquite, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1995
  2. Ross F. Meriwether & Associates, Inc. v. Aulbach, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
  3. RSR Properties, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1989
  4. Medical Personnel Pool of Dallas, Inc. v. SealeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Pan American Bank of Brownsville v. NowlandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API