Legal Opinion

Castell v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 20, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff for summary judgment in an action against the United States to recover an alleged overpayment of taxes.

The papers submitted state the following facts: The will of Paul Isenberg, who died in 1903, bequeathed to his widow, Beta Isenberg, a fund of securities composed principally of stock in four Hawaiian sugar plantations. These securities were on deposit with H. Hackfield & Co., Ltd., an Hawaiian corporation, of which Paul Isenberg had been president. Some of the stock of the corporation composed a part of the fund. Pursuant to admonitions in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Chandler & Price Co. v. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Henkels v. SutherlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Texas City Terminal Railway Co. v. American Equitable Assurance Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1955
  2. Pine Grove Manor v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  3. Duisberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  4. Real Estate Brokers' Examinations, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API