Legal Opinion

Veigh Cummings v. Larry R. Bullock

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 7, 1966No. 20188_1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:

This is an action for specific performance of a contract to sell land. Jurisdiction rests on diversity of citizenship. The court found against the plaintiff and he appeals. We affirm. The sole question presented is whether the court erred in holding that plaintiff had failed to exercise an option to purchase contained in a lease of land located in Wyoming. A brief statement of the law may make its application to the facts more readily apparent.

1. The action was filed in the Northern District of California. The trial court was therefore required to look to the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Gagnon Co., Inc. v. Nevada Desert InnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. People of the State of California v. United States of America, Santa Margarita Mutual Water Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Aldabe v. AldabeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wong v. Tenneco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Wayne G. Quasha v. Shale Development CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  3. Simons v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Best v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Holiday Inns of America, Inc. v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API