Legal Opinion

Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 4, 2014No. 2013-1377PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RADER, Circuit Judge.

Consumer Watchdog appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision affirming the patentability of claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 7,029,913 ('913 patent). Because Consumer Watchdog has not established an injury in fact sufficient to confer Article III standing, however, this court dismisses the appeal.

I

Consumer Watchdog is a self-described “not-for-profit public charity dedicated to providing a voice for taxpayers and consumers in special interest-dominated public discourse, government and politics.” Appellant’s Br. 1. In 2006, Consumer Watchdog requested inter…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  2. Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  4. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Synvina C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
  5. Jtekt Corporation v. Gkn Automotive Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API