Consumer Watchdog v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Circuit Judge.
Consumer Watchdog appeals from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s decision affirming the patentability of claims 1-4 of U.S. Patent No. 7,029,913 ('913 patent). Because Consumer Watchdog has not established an injury in fact sufficient to confer Article III standing, however, this court dismisses the appeal.
I
Consumer Watchdog is a self-described “not-for-profit public charity dedicated to providing a voice for taxpayers and consumers in special interest-dominated public discourse, government and politics.” Appellant’s Br. 1. In 2006, Consumer Watchdog requested inter…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. Synvina C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Jtekt Corporation v. Gkn Automotive Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.