Legal Opinion

Alcala v. Burns

District Court, S.D. Iowa

Decided October 9, 1973No. Civ. 73-86-2, 73-110-2PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT.

HANSON, Chief Judge.

In these consolidated causes of action, brought pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. Section 1983, the plaintiffs ask this Court to declare invalid, and enjoin defendants from continuing, acts by which defendants deny A.F.D.C. assistance to pregnant mothers and their unborn children. Defendants have denied A.F.D.C. assistance to these plaintiffs pursuant to their interpretation of an Iowa Department of Social Services regulation, such interpretation being that A.F.D.C. assistance is not available to otherwise eligible…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Reetz v. BozanichSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Burns v. AlcalaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. California Welfare Rights Organization v. BrianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Carver v. HookerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973
  4. Parks v. HardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Wisdom v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API