Legal Opinion
United States v. Paguio
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 1997No. Nos. 95-50370, 95-50375PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINFELD, Circuit Judge:
This ease turns on Federal Rule of Evidence 804(b)(3), the hearsay exception for inculpatory statements by unavailable witnesses.
I. Facts
Appellants Gil Manuel Paguio, Jr. and Angelica D. Acosta, husband and wife, were convicted of false statements to a bank to influence action on a loan application, under *93018 U.S.C. §§ 2 & 1014. Paguio Jr.’s father, Gil Paguio, Sr., initiated the loan process. The father approached the institution’s loan officer about a $204,000 loan so that his son, Paguio Jr., and Acosta, could buy property next to his house. The loan officer…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- John Harvey Adamson v. James G. Ricketts, Director, Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Robert Joseph SatterfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John David GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Ray Owen SlaughterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. ShryockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Saleem Bey v. Superintendent Greene SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- State v. ParedesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- United States v. Donald Richard McCleskey Jr.,defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Antoine JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.