Legal Opinion

Gamino v. Greenwell

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1981No. 6903PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BURNS, J.

The issue in this case is whether a party in a family court case may pursue a civil court action involving different parties and different issues when the result sought would contradict a final and unappealed order issued in the family court case.

We hold that the civil court action may not be pursued in such a situation.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rudy Gamino and Doris Gamino were parties in a divorce action. By order dated March 24, 1977, Family Court Judge Vitousek awarded the parties’ Pacific Heights house half to each party, ordered it sold, appointed an appraiser,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kapiolani Estate, Ltd. v. AtcherlyHawaii Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Big Island Small Ranchers Ass'n v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In re the Estate of KamauohaHawaii Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Carey v. Hawaiian Lumber Mills, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. First Hawaiian Bank v. WeeksHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Jou v. National Interstate Ins. Co. of Haw.Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Cooper v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Nakata v. NakataHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. Estate of KamHawaii Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API