Mason v. Lyl Productions

I dissent. In essence the majority hold that " [r]egardless of whether Lyl’s order for Portland not to leave the studio was communicated to her or her authorized agent prior to the time she left, Portland’s act in leaving would not constitute grounds for [Lyl’s] terminating the contract" because "the trial court determined upon an abundance of evidence, that the order . . . was unreasonable under the circumstances." One reads in vain the trial court’s conclusion of law set forth verbatim by the majority immediately before such holding, in order to discover those words which, according to the…