In Re Lennon
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. On March 11, 1893, the Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Railway Company filed its bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio against the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Bailnvay Company and other railroad companies, which connected with complainant in the carrying on of interstate commerce, charging that it was the duty of defendants…
Read the full summary
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. On March 11, 1893, the Toledo, Ann Arbor and North Michigan Railway Company filed its bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio against the Lake Shore and Michigan Southern Bailnvay Company and other railroad companies, which connected with complainant in the carrying on of interstate commerce, charging that it was the duty of defendants under the act of Congress of February 4, 1888, and the amendments thereto, regulating commerce between the States, to…
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Fuller
delivered fhe opinion of the court.
¥e had occasion in Cross v. Burke, 146 U. S. 82, to examine the various statutes in reference to appeals. to this court from judgments of. Circuit Courts on habeas corpus. The question there was whether this, court had jurisdiction to review judgments of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia on habeas corpus by. reason of section. .846 of the Revised Statutes of. the District,' which provided that final judgments,. orders, or decrees of the Supreme Court of the District might be reSxamined or reversed or affirmed by.this court upon writ of error or…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Nishimura Ekiu v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Lau Ow Bew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Horner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cross v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
3Cited by42 opinions
- United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Craig v. HechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Pierce v. CreecySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Rice v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Fred C. Fisher and Charles C. Cohn, on Behalf of Felix Barcelon, Plffs. In Err. v. Colonel David J. Baker, Jr., and Captain John Doe ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.