Legal Opinion
State v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 17, 1992No. 27288-8-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, J.
Phillip Arthur Smith appeals from his conviction on three counts of second degree burglary. Smith contends that the trial court erred in (1) failing to enter written findings following the denial of his CrR 3.5 and 3.6 motions to suppress, (2) ruling that the police had probable cause to arrest him, (3) admitting evidence of his prior convictions, and (4) imposing an exceptional sentence above the standard range. We affirm Smith's conviction but remand for resentencing.
I
On the morning of April 7, 1990, at approximately 5:12 a.m., Kirkland Police Officer James Kissenger received word of a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. DunawayWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. NordbyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Lawrence E. Wilson, Warden v. William Eugene PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Allingham v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. BourneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. FlakeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- State v. CunninghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.