Legal Opinion

People v. Beu

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1994No. 2—94—0001, 2—94—0007 consPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bowman

Defendants, Randall Beu and Herbert Pitzman, were charged by indictment with eavesdropping (720 ILCS 5/14—2 (West 1992)). Pursuant to defendants’ motion, the trial court dismissed the indictment. The State appeals, contending that the court erred in dismissing the indictment based on a finding of a substantial denial of due process.

Defendants Pitzman and Beu are the chief and administrative sergeant, respectively, of the Woodstock police department. The charges in this case arose from the alleged taping of calls on an unlisted, nonemergency telephone line which was used by officers, arrestees…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. People v. LawsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. FasslerIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  5. People v. LucasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HoganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 198.GJ.20, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Phillips v. GannottiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Andersen v. Village of GlenviewDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. In Re GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS 198.GJ.20, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API