Legal Opinion
Einhorn v. M.L. Ruberton Construction Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 28, 2010No. Civil Action 06-2511PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRENAS, Senior District Judge:
Presently before the Court is Defendant M.L. Ruberton Construction Co.’s (Ruberton) Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (Motion). The Motion follows a prior opinion and order, which granted Defendant Ruberton’s motion for summary judgment. 1 For the following reasons, the Motion will be denied.
I
This case has a long and complex factual and procedural history that, for the most part, is not relevant to the present Motion. The Court will briefly summarize the relevant background. 2 Over the past four years, three related cases have been brought before this…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ursic v. Bethlehem MinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Upholsterers' International Union Pension Fund v. Artistic Furniture of PontiacCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- West v. KeveCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Gerald E. Fields v. Thompson Printing Company, Inc. Gilbert M. Thompson, Gerald E. Fields v. Thompson Printing Co Gilbert M. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- ATLANTIC PLASTIC & HAND SURGERY, PA v. ANTHEM BLUE CROSS LIFE AND HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- EMPLOYER TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND v. UNION TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUNDDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- EMPLOYER TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUND v. UNION TRUSTEES OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA TEAMSTERS AND EMPLOYERS WELFARE FUNDDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021