Legal Opinion

Sierota v. Scott

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 31, 1960No. 19367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Sutton.

We might label this an exercise in semantics as will more fully hereinafter appear.

Sierota had a license from the State of Colorado, issued under C.R.S. ’53, 75-1-1, et seq., to sell fermented malt beverages. When it first issued, his place of business was in Arapahoe County outside of the city limits of defendant City of Englewood. Subsequently the area involved was annexed to the city and still later the city council adopted a licensing ordinance (No. 4, Series 1959) which required Sierota, when his previous license expired, to elect whether he would sell…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958
  2. Lynch v. Tilden Produce Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Ray v. DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942
  4. Buddy & Lloyd's Store No. 1, Inc. v. City CouncilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  5. Gettman v. Board of County Com'rs of Morgan CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Woolverton v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. BIG TOP, INCORPORATED v. SchooleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
  3. Pierce v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
  4. City of Aurora v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  5. Woolverton v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API