Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Bassett

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Monroe county court. Action by Giles H. Boyd against William Bassett and others to foreclose a lien. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Bassett appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.

It is established by the evidence, and found by the learned county judge at the trial, that prior to December 3, 1888, the defendant Bassett and the defendant Esterheld entered into a contract in writing, by the terms of which Esterheld agreed to do the carpenter work and painting, and furnish the necessary materials therefor, in the construction of a certain house for Bassett, situated on the corner of William and George streets, in the city of Rochester, for which he was to receive as compensation the sum of $1,050. On the 3d day of December, 1888, Esterheld had furnished labor and…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. McLaughlinNew York Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Boyd v. BassettNew York Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API