Legal Opinion
Moore v. McLaughlin
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 22, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Appeal from circuit court, Franklin county. Action by Darius A. Moore and another against William McLaughlin and others to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. From a judgment dismissing the complaint as to defendant McLaughlin, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.
This action is brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien filed in pursuance of the provisions of chapter 342 of the Laws of 1885. On the trial, plaintiffs were nonsuited, on the ground, as stated in the case, that the notice of lien was not properly signed. Defendants now claim that the disposition of the case below was right, not only on the ground stated, but also for the reason that the verification to the notice of lien is defective. It is as follows:
“County of St. Lawrence—as.: William A. Moore, being duly sworn, says he is one of the firm of D. A. & W. A. Moore, and one of the persons…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kealey v. MurrayNew York Supreme Court · 1891
- Boyd v. BassettNew York Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by3 opinions
- Union Stove Works v. KlingmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Reeves v. SeitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Montgomery Bros. & Co. v. G. L. Cole, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1930