Cotton v. Insurance Co. of North America
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, President Judge:
This appeal is from an order granting summary judgment. Appellants were uninsured passengers in an uninsured motor vehicle when it collided with an insured motor vehicle. Upon application to the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan, appellee was designated appellants’ assigned obligor. Subsequently, without appellee’s knowledge, appellants entered into a settlement agreement with the driver of the insured vehicle. The trial court held that under the Uninsured Motorist Act, 40 P.S. § 2000(e)(2), appellants’ settlement precluded their recovery of uninsured motorist benefits…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harthcock v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 1971
- Associated Hospital Service v. PustilnikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Illinois Automobile Insurance Exchange v. BraunSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Craig v. Iowa Kemper Mutual Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- In Re Estate of FoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Melendez v. Pennsylvania Assigned Claims PlanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Wheeler v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Archer v. State Farm InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Littlejohn v. Keystone InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Nagle v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.