Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1998No. 1998-0384PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 462.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. ROMANIW. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Romaniw,

1998-Ohio-25.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Disbarment—Deliberate misappropriation of funds from two guardianships for personal benefit. (No. 98-384—Submitted June 24, 1998—Decided October 28, 1998.) ON CERTIFIED REPORT by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 97-79. __________________ {¶ 1} In April 1995, the Cuyahoga County Probate Court appointed respondent, Chrystine Romaniw of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. BelockOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RomaniwOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lake Cty. Bar Assn. v. MazzoccoOhio Supreme Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API