Legal Opinion

Lane v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 1965No. 8353PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Judge.

Billy D. Lane, as plaintiff, instituted suit against Osby E. Wilson and Gene Arthur Fields, as defendants, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained by Lane in a collision between a motorcycle driven by Wilson, on which Lane was riding as a passenger, and an automobile driven by Fields. In due time, defendant Wilson filed a cross-claim against codefendant Fields [V.A.M.R. Rule 55.49], in which Wilson sought damages of $12,-000 for personal injuries alleged to have resulted from the same collision. Thereafter, plaintiff Lane dismissed his petition as…

2Cases cited57 opinions

  1. Banks v. Morris CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  2. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Delay Ex Rel. Delay v. WardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  4. Vietmeier v. VossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  5. Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Hastings v. CoppageSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Epple v. Western Auto Supply Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  3. Hewitt v. MastersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Johnson v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Wiseman v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API