Legal Opinion

Fordyce v. Dixon

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1888No. 6306PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from McLennan. Tried below before the Hon. Eugene Williams.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Chief Justice.

This action was originally brought by W. M. Dixon, with leave of the circuit court of the United States, against W. R. Woodward, receiver, appointed by that court to conduct the business of the Texas &St. Louis Railway Company, to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been received by his wife while a passenger on the train operated by the receiver.

Woodward resigned, and the plaintiff in error was appointed to the receivership in his stead, and made party defendant. Dixon died pending the action, and his wife, in her own right, and as next friend for their minor…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Searcy v. GrantTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Panhandle & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. German Insurance v. I. M. Pearlstone & SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  4. Gomez v. ScanlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API