Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Nolan

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 6, 2003No. AC 23277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

By motion dated April 12, 2002, the plaintiff, Darlene D. Nolan, sought to open the judgment of dissolution of her marriage, dated November 22, 1995, on the ground of fraud.1 The plaintiff, the ex-wife, claimed that the written agreement signed by the parties and incorporated into the judgment, was procured by “the gross fraud and deception practiced by the defendant,” Michael J. Nolan, her ex-husband. The motion was denied, and the plaintiff now appeals from that judgment. We conclude that the trial court was correct and affirm the judgment.

The plaintiff claims that she proved that…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oneglia v. OnegliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  2. Mattson v. MattsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  3. Pospisil v. PospisilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Weinstein v. WeinsteinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  2. Brody v. BrodyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API