Legal Opinion

Carothers v. Ti-Caro

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 18, 1986No. 8610IC364PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

Defendants attempt at the outset to dispense with plaintiffs arguments by maintaining that plaintiffs appeal should be dismissed. Defendants may challenge the propriety of the judgment for the first time in their brief pursuant to the proviso under Rule 10(a), N.C. Rules App. P. Specifically, defendants contend that the appeal should be dismissed for the following reason: no timely appeal was taken by either party from the 20 February 1985 opinion and award as indicated by (1) the absence of a notice of appeal in the record on appeal and (2) the Full Commission’s finding of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Mabe v. North Carolina Granite CorporationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Smith v. American & Efird MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. Dail v. Kellex Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Smith v. American and Efird MillsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brown v. S & N COMMUNICATIONS, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  2. Effingham v. THE KROGER CO.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Matthews v. Petroleum Tank Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Wagner v. Stuckagain HeightsAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Brannon v. Tampa TribuneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API