Legal Opinion
Bombardier Corp. v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 30, 2002No. CIV. 01-2335(RJL)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
LEON, District Judge.
On May 1, 1996, Bombardier Corporation (“Bombardier”), GEC Alstom (“Alstom”), and National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“NRRPC,” “Amtrak”) entered into three fixed price contracts (collectively referred to as “Contract”) for the design and construction of high-speed passenger trainsets, locomotives, rail equipment, and facilities to be operated by Amtrak in the Northeast corridor. 1 These trainsets comprise the Acela Express trains, now in use between Washington, D.C., and Boston, Massachusetts.
The design and construction processes have been riddled…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Shook of West Virginia, Inc. v. York City Sewer AuthorityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- Mario & Di Bono Plastering Co. v. Rivergate Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tattoo Art, Inc. v. TAT International, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Deanne C. Dewitt Freise & Eric L. Freise, Res. v. Anderson Vacation Property, Llc, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Trillium Transportation Fuels LLC v. Integral Energy LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2023
- Truong Son Market, Inc. v. State Auto Property and Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2022