Russell v. Davison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Concurrence
BAILEY, Special Justice
(concurring in the conclusion). The majority opinion holds that all of the contentions herein resolve themselves into the one question of whether or not delivery of a legacy may be made by an executor prior to a decree of distribution. I am not in accord with that view. That an executor may do so, subject to the rights of creditors, and in the absence of other intervening factors, I think is correct as an abstract principle. Certainly, according to equitable principles, where the bare facts are that the legacy is delivered to the legatee by the executor prematurely and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Teague v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Gafford v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Weatherford v. SemkoffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- International News Service v. News Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- In Re Coyne's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.