Legal Opinion

McClellan v. Davis

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1928No. 4847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

The defendants Davis and wife gave three non-negotiable notes, payable in one, two and three years, to the Fruitland State Bank, at the bank, and secured them by a real estate mortgage to the bank. In April, 1920, for value, the two last-maturing notes were sold and delivered to plaintiff, without knowledge or notice to defendants. This action is brought upon the last note due, and to foreclose the mortgage. The plurality of defendants is immaterial, and references will be to defendant Davis, the husband.

The defendant alleged as an affirmative defense, and so far as material here the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kortright v. . CadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. First Nat. Bank of Idaho v. ReinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  3. State National Bank v. HyattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Kelley v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Perre v. CastroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mauldin v. Sunshine Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mountain States Implement Co. v. AraveIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Brinton v. HaightIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Uhlig v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API