Legal Opinion
Chambers v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1951No. 1038PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Judge.
Defendants were charged with eighteen separate violations of Wage Order No. 7 of the Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board under authority of the District Minimum Wage Law.1 Six of these charges related to a female employee, Ethel Gray Lloyd, six related to another female employee, Garnette B. Bowyer, and the remaining six charges related to a third female employee, Anne M. Curtin. As to Ethel Gray Lloyd, it was alleged in the first count that defendants as her employers failed to pay her the minimum wage during each week of the period between the week ending May 7, 1949,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Yeager v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
- People v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Solomon v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
- Adams Express Co. v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- State v. SandersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chambers v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- O'BRYANT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- Chambers v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
- O'BRYANT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966
- O'BRYANT v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1966