Legal Opinion

Dickerson v. City Bank & Trust Co.

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided June 29, 1984No. Civ. A. 82-4112PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ■

O’CONNOR, Chief Judge.

This matter is presently before the court on plaintiff’s application for attorney’s fees and on defendant City Bank and Trust Company’s [City Bank] motion to alter or amend the judgment. We have reviewed the memoranda submitted by the parties and are now prepared to rule.

Plaintiff filed his action on May 18, 1982, alleging, inter alia, violations of 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985. On January 5, 1983, the plaintiff moved to amend his complaint to add a cause of action for recovery under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Beresford N. Springer v. Gretchen SeamanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  2. Dorothy Willner v. Gene Budig, F. Allan Hanson, Alfred E. Johnson, Robert L. Lineberry, Robert J. Smith, and Deanell TachaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. Ismail v. CohenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  4. Vaughns v. Bd. of Educ. of Prince George's CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  5. Estate of Sisk v. ManzanaresDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API