Legal Opinion

Malecek v. Tower Grove & Lafayette Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 15, 1874PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, Judge

This was an action on the ease founded on a breach of duty by the defendant as a common carrier, in carrying the plaintiff as a passenger on its street railroad car.

*18The petitioner alleged that the defendant was a corporation engaged in the business of carrying persons, as j>assengers, from one point to another in the city of St. Louis, as a common carrier; that on the 20th of February, 1872, the defendant was running its cars from Fourth Street to Tower Hill, within the limits of the city of St. Louis; that on said day the defendant undertook, as a common carrier, to convey plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. Mo., K. & T. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  2. Gillett v. Missouri Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Nieto v. ClarkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1858

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Forrester v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Graham v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  4. State Ex Rel. United Factories, Inc. v. HostetterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939
  5. Porterfield v. American Surety Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API