Legal Opinion

State v. Larocco

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1983No. 18267PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant was convicted of the theft of an $80,000 truck. 1 He urges insufficiency of evidence to identify him as the thief, and points to claimed unfair “lineups” and “arrays of photographs” to support his contention. No objection was made to any such evidence admitted or its insufficiency so that his point on appeal in this respect is not before us. In State v. McCardell, 2 we cited with approval a Kansas case, 3 which held as follows:

The ... rule long adhered to in this state requires timely and specific objection to admission of evidence in order for the question of admissibility to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. McCardellUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. CoboUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  4. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. EagleUtah Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. GreenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. State v. ParsonsUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. IrwinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996
  5. State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API