YOUNG GROENEWEG v. CITIBANK NA
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION YOUNG GROENEWEG, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 1:26-CV-74-HAB-ALT CITIBANK NA, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER This matter presents a procedural conundrum: when a state court consolidates two cases and the defendant removes one to federal court, what happens to the other? Pro se plaintiff Young Groeneweg requests the Court clarify that only one suit was removed and the other remains pending with the state court. (ECF No. 31). Defendant Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank”) argues that, under hundred-year-old United States Supreme Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gray v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ebony Bridewell-Sledge v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Figg & Muller Engineers, Inc. v. PetruskaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.