York v. State
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRYNER, Chief Judge.
James York was convicted, following a jury trial, of two counts of perjury, resulting from testimony that he gave before the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board. On appeal, York raises a number of issues relating to his indictment. He also contends that the trial judge erred in giving supplemental instructions to the jury, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, and that he was denied due process as a result of pre-indictment delay. We remand for further proceedings on York’s claim of pre-indictment delay. As to all other issues, we affirm.
In the fall of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Risher v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Frink v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Covington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. MouserCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1991
- State v. GonzalesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. WrightAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
- Khan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2009
- Moberg v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.