Legal Opinion

Benhart v. Rockford Park District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 30, 1991No. 2-90-1190, 2-90-1433 consPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Woodward

Plaintiffs, Mary Ann and Ray Benhart, appeal the circuit court’s dismissal of their second amended complaint seeking damages for injuries Mary Ann suffered while at a facility owned by defendant, Rockford Park District. Plaintiffs’ sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that the first amended complaint failed to state a cause of action for willful and wanton conduct.

In count I of the first amended complaint, plaintiffs alleged that on June 18, 1988, Mary Ann paid an entrance fee and was admitted to the Magic Waters theme park and wave pool owned by defendant. Mary Ann…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ward v. K Mart Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kozak v. RETIREMENT BOARD OF FIREMEN'S ANNUITY AND BENEFIT FUNDIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Burdinie v. Village of Glendale HeightsIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Lynch v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF COLLINSVILLE COMMUNITY UNIT DIST.Illinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. MikuschIllinois Supreme Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Express Valet, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. Winfrey v. Chicago Park DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Kirwan v. Lincolnshire-Riverwoods Fire Protection DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Puss N Boots, Inc. v. Mayor's License Commission of City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  5. Hampton v. CashmoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API