Legal Opinion

Minkow v. Sanders

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*598The documentary evidence conclusively disposed of plaintiffs legal malpractice claims (see Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326 [2002]). The hearing court found that plaintiffs disobedience of the so-ordered stipulation directing her to transfer certain custodial accounts to her husband’s attorney to be placed in escrow or immediately liquidate the accounts and transfer the proceeds was willful. In light of such willful conduct, the motion court properly found that plaintiff— not her attorneys — was the proximate cause of her contempt adjudication and the resulting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Somma v. Dansker & Aspromonte AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Delfyette v. FisherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  4. Nimkoff v. NimkoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Callaghan v. BrunelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  2. Herschman v. Kern, Augustine, Conroy & SchoppmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. Herschman v. Kern, Augustine, Conroy & SchoppmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API