Legal Opinion

Barr v. City of Sinton

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2009No. 06-0074PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

The Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act (TRFRA) provides that “a government agency may not substantially burden a person’s free exercise of religion [unless it] demonstrates that the application of the burden to the person ... is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest [and] is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.” 1 TRFRA does not immunize religious conduct from government regulation; it requires the government to tread carefully and lightly when its actions substantially burden religious exercise.

In this case, a city resident, as part of a religious…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bennett v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  3. A.A. Ex Rel. Betenbaugh v. Needville Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  4. the City of Round Rock, Texas and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Jaime Rodriguez and Round Rock Fire Fighters AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Merced v. City of EulessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API