Barr v. City of Sinton
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht
The Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act (TRFRA) provides that “a government agency may not substantially burden a person’s free exercise of religion [unless it] demonstrates that the application of the burden to the person ... is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest [and] is the least restrictive means of furthering that interest.” 1 TRFRA does not immunize religious conduct from government regulation; it requires the government to tread carefully and lightly when its actions substantially burden religious exercise.
In this case, a city resident, as part of a religious…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bennett v. ReynoldsTexas Supreme Court · 2010
- Ken Paxton, Attorney General of Texas v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- A.A. Ex Rel. Betenbaugh v. Needville Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- the City of Round Rock, Texas and Round Rock Fire Chief Larry Hodge v. Jaime Rodriguez and Round Rock Fire Fighters AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 2013
- Merced v. City of EulessCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.