Legal Opinion

Merced v. City of Euless

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 31, 2009No. 08-10358, 08-10506PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENNIFER W. ELROD, Circuit Judge:

The Texas Religious Freedom and Restoration Act (TRFRA), Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code ch. 110, prevents the state and local Texas governments from substantially burdening a person’s tree exercise of religion unless the government can demonstrate that doing so furthers a compelling governmental interest in the least restrictive manner. In this case, we must decide if the city of Euless, Texas, may practically forbid the keeping — even for brief periods — and slaughter of four-legged animals within its borders, a ban that prevents practitioners of the Santería…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Opulent Life Church v. City of Holly SpringsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  2. Marc Veasey v. Greg AbbottCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
  3. Loftin v. City of Prentiss, MSCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2022
  4. A.A. Ex Rel. Betenbaugh v. Needville Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API