Legal Opinion

Aiken v. National Fire Safety Counsellors

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 6, 1956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Seitz, Chancellor:

This involves the strange business of an attorney disclaiming authority to settle the claims of over one hundred plaintiffs after he clearly purported to do so in open court.

Some 180 plaintiffs (husbands and wives) brought this action seeking to rescind contracts under which the defendant, National Fire Safety Counsellors, installed fire detection devices in their homes. Plaintiffs alleged fraud and sought to have their notes cancelled. Prior to the commencement of this action National Fire Safety Coun-sellors had sold the notes obtained from most plaintiffs to a finance…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strattner v. Wilmington City Electric Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1901
  2. Wood v. BangsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1900

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kinkaid v. CessnaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Read v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  3. Aiken v. National Fire Safety CounsellorsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1956
  4. Read v. BakerDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1977
  5. Corbesco, Inc. v. Local No. 542, International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API