Legal Opinion
Canandaigua Messenger, Inc. v. Wharmby
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 15, 2002No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from parts of an order and judgment (one document) of Supreme Court, Ontario County (Henry, Jr., J.), entered May 22, 2001, that, inter alia, directed respondents Canandaigua Recreation Development Corporation and Dennis A. Morga to provide petitioner access for inspection and copying of non-exempt documentation.
It is hereby ordered that the order and judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously modified on the law by vacating the award of attorney’s fees to petitioner and as modified the order and judgment is affirmed without costs.
Memorandum: We agree with Supreme…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon v. Village of Monticello, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Niagara Environmental Action v. City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Goetschius v. Board of Education of the Greenburgh Eleven Union Free School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Hopkins v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Niagara Environmental Action v. City of Niagara FallsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Perez v. City UniversityNew York Supreme Court · 2002
- Reese v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009