Niagara Environmental Action v. City of Niagara Falls
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division, insofar as appealed from, should be affirmed, with costs.
It cannot be said on the record before us, in view of the then pending litigation, that the Appellate Division erred, as a matter of law, in holding that respondent had a reasonable basis in law for withholding the requested materials. Accordingly, the denial of petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees cannot be disturbed by this court.
Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of…
2Cited by14 opinions
- New York State Defenders Ass'n v. New York State PoliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Beechwood Restorative Care Center v. SignorNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Norton v. Town of IslipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Hopkins v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rome Sentinel Co. v. City of RomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.