Legal Opinion

Motorists Mutual Ins. v. Lumbermens Mutual Ins.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1965No. 38655PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This action is for a judgment declaring coverages under two standard automobile insurance policies, one issued by Motorists Mutual Insurance Company to Walter. J. Braun, the other issued by The Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company to Joan Bailey.

On October 31,1959, while both policies were in effect, Braun injured a third person while driving Bailey’s car with her permission. It is admitted that under standard clauses contáined in each of these policies, both policies cover the claim of the *106injured person. The question to be answered is whether the coverage of either is as to the excess only…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. American Automobile Insurance Co. v. Republic Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Turpin v. Standard Reliance Insurance Co.(Mutual)Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Trinity Universal Ins. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Mountain States Mutual Casualty Co. v. American Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. American Universal Insurance Company v. DykhouseDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1963

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Maryland Cas. Co. v. American Family Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Dairyland Mutual Insurance Company v. AndersenArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  3. DiSanto v. Safeco Insurance of AmericaOhio Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. v. Home Indemnity Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ohio Government Risk Management Plan v. County Risk Sharing Authority, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API