Trinity Universal Ins. v. General Accident, Fire & Life Assur. Corp.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
Although the presentation of this case has resulted in extended discussion and the citation of numerous authorities, the question is clear and uninvolved when reduced to its lowest terms. Then too, the decision must be limited to the circumstances peculiar to this particular controversy.
This is not a dispute between the insured and the two insuring companies. The latter concede the full coverage in the total sum of $30,000 — $20,000 on one policy and $10,000 on the other. They agree further that if either policy constituted the only coverage it then would be the obligation of…
2Cited by32 opinions
- Oregon Auto. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Cosmopolitan Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Putnam v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- United Services Automobile Association v. James B. RussomCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeTexas Supreme Court · 1969
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.