Legal Opinion
FRUITT v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 12, 2010No. 09-6027PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After the district court reversed and remanded the Commissioner’s decision denying her social-security benefits, Michelle K. Fruitt filed a motion for attorneys’ fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The district court awarded the requested attorneys’ fees, but not the requested filing-fee cost. The cost denial was based on a determination that, though Ms. Fruitt’s filing complied with the thirty-day EAJA deadline for an attorneys’-fees application, see id. § 2412(d)(1)(B), it did not meet the fourteen-day deadline for a bill of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- John H. Smith v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Chamber of Commerce of United States v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States Ex Rel. Ritchie v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Coffey v. Freeport McMoran Copper & GoldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Conrad v. Phone Directories Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Ailon-AilonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Caldwell v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 2017
- United States v. JimDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.