Legal Opinion

People v. Gisondi

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1967No. Docket 2,576PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaum, J.

This is a delayed appeal, upon leave granted, to review one issue:

“Did the trial court commit reversible error in admitting into evidence the confession of a codefendant, which was made in the presence of defendant Gisondi, as evidence of defendant Gisondi’s guilt?”

Harold Hummel and Michael Gisondi were convicted of first-degree murder 1 by a jury in the Oakland county circuit court. It was the theory of the people that Hummel shot and killed two persons in the course of an attempted robbery in which the appellant Michael Gisondi was a participant.

The confession in question was made in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. JablonskiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. People v. ParksMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. People v. FryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. People v. KelleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. People v. DunnMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API