State v. Gerhardt
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentFlynn, J.
I agree with the majority that the “economic damages that can be awarded as restitution include reasonable expenses necessarily incurred by a victim to redress the harm caused to the victim by a defendant’s criminal conduct.” 273 Or App at 594. I respectfully disagree, however, that the language of the victim’s restitution request, here, precludes an award of restitution for the expense necessary for the victim to obtain a Family Abuse Prevention Act *601(FAPA) restraining order. I dissent separately to emphasize my understanding that our causation standard does not make restitution dependent on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. PumphreyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. StephensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- State v. JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. RamosCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.