Legal Opinion
Folsom v. Ninety-Six TP.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina
Decided July 28, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions
At Law.
1Opinion of the Court
PRITCHARD, Circuit Judge.
This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the auditor and treasurer of the county of Greenwood to assess.and collect a, judgment recovered against the township of Nintey-Six for certain bonds issued by it in aid of a railroad company. By an act of 1882 the Legislature of South Carolina chartered *497the Greenville & Port Royal Railroad Company. Sections 6 and 8 of this act authorized cities, towns, townships, and counties interested in the construction of railroads to subscribe to the capital stock of said railroad company, and to issue bonds in payment…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Mount Pleasant v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Louisiana v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Walker v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. Pine Grove TP.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1904
- Susong v. Cokesbury TP.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1904
- Planters' & Savings Bank v. Huiett TP.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1904