Legal Opinion

Dane-Elec Corp. v. Bodokh

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 24, 2019No. G055312Published

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 5/24/19 * CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATON IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE DANE-ELEC CORPORATION, USA, Plaintiff, Cross-Defendant and G055312 Respondent, (Consol. with G055784) v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2015-00789866) NESSIM BODOKH, OPINION Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Appellant. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Orange County, Nathan R. Scott, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. Motion for Judicial Notice. Granted. Tira Law APC and Patrick R. Tira for Defendant, Cross-Complainant and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Howard v. Owens CorningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Hutnick v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Amtower v. Photon Dynamics, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Acquire II, Ltd. v. Colton Real Estate GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API